Cases 31 - 40 of 103
GLENN v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
as 1:2016cv01745
Plaintiff:
RODERICK GLENN
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
GLENN v. FAY et al
as 1:2016cv01452
Plaintiff:
JAY GLENN
Defendant:
THOMAS FORTUNE FAY , FAY LAW GROUP, P.A. , STEVEN R. PERLES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
GLENN v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2016cv01457
Plaintiff:
CARMICHAEL ARVEL GLENN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TEL-COURT COOPERATIVE, INC. v. ESTATE OF IRENE DAVIS
as 1:2016cv00902
Plaintiff:
TEL-COURT COOPERATIVE, INC.
Defendant:
ESTATE OF IRENE DAVIS and GLENN A. DAVIS
Counter_claimant:
ESTATE OF IRENE DAVIS
Counter_defendant:
TEL-COURT COOPERATIVE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
HENDRIX v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2015cv02103
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES
Plaintiff:
GLENN HENDRIX
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
VASATURO v. PETERKA et al
as 1:2015cv01736
Plaintiff:
DARREN R. VASATURO
Defendant:
SASHA PETERKA, JAMIE ROUGHAN, GLENN PAQUETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
COULIBALY v. KERRY et al
as 1:2015cv01279
Plaintiff:
TIEMOKO COULIBALY
Defendant:
JOHN F. KERRY, GLENN BUDD, GLORIA SLATER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
ALLEN et al v. BROWN et al
as 1:2015cv00969
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. ALLEN , LUIS A. RODRIGUEZ-SOTO , STEVEN SMALLWOOD and others
Defendant:
JERRY BROWN, BRIAN HAWKINS, JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
