Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Continental Insurance Company et al v. Global Transportation Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04527
Plaintiff:
Continental Insurance Company and Bluestem Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Global Transportation Services, Inc., Odyssey International Services, Inc., Doe One through Doe Ten and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Federal Insurance Company v. Global Container Line, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv05684
Plaintiff:
Federal Insurance Company
Defendant:
Global Container Line, Inc., Jacobson Global Logistics, Inc., Hyundai Merchant Marine Co. Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Ivy Creation Ltd v. Global Container Line Inc et al
as 2:2008cv00030
Plaintiff:
Ivy Creation Ltd
Defendant:
Global Container Line Inc and Stonepath Logistics (Hong Kong) Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
CHINA EXPORT & CREDIT INSURANCE CORPORATION et al v. GLOBAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv04051
Plaintiff:
CHINA EXPORT & CREDIT INSURANCE CORPORATION and ANHUI TECHNOLOGY IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD.
Defendant:
GLOBAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., GLOBAL CONTAINER LINE, INC., MJT IMPORTS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
GLOBAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. et al v. MJT IMPORTS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv01814
Plaintiff:
GLOBAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. and GLOBAL CONTAINER LINE, INC.
Defendant:
MJT IMPORTS CORPORATION, AMF TRUCKING & WAREHOUSE, INC., BASIC WEAR, INC. and others
Cross Claimant:
AMF TRUCKING & WAREHOUSE, INC., AMF TRUCKING & WAREHOUSE, INC., GLOBAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. and others
Cross Defendant:
MJT IMPORTS CORPORATION, MJT IMPORTS CORPORATION, GLOBAL CONTAINER LINE, INC. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
GTS LOGISTICS (PRIVATE) LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
