Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SCHNEIDER et al v. GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.
as 2:2022cv03299
Plaintiff:
CODY SCHNEIDER and JOSEPH JASKOLSKI
Defendant:
GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
GLOBUS MEDICAL INC. v. SKY SURGICAL et al
as 2:2022cv02626
Plaintiff:
GLOBUS MEDICAL INC.
Defendant:
SKY SURGICAL and JAY JAMISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
GLOBUS MEDICAL INC. v. SHARP et al
as 2:2022cv00383
Plaintiff:
GLOBUS MEDICAL INC.
Defendant:
EDWARD SHARP, ANDREW MILLER, BROOKE STEPHENS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv03896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MOSKOWITZ FAMILY LLC v. GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.
as 2:2020cv03271
Defendant:
GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.
Plaintiff:
MOSKOWITZ FAMILY LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Barry v. Globus Medical, Inc.
as 2:2018mc00178
Plaintiff:
DR. MARK A. BARRY
Defendant:
GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.
O'CONNOR v. KORNEVAS et al
as 5:2018cv04277
Defendant:
ROKAS KORNEVAS, CLAIMS DIRECT ACCESS, GLOBUS LOGISTICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DONZELLE O'CONNOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC. v. GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv01187
Plaintiff:
DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC.
Defendant:
GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC. , RONALD G. SPORER and GREGORY M. JANOFSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARRY v. GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.
as 2:2017cv02998
Plaintiff:
MARK A. BARRY
Defendant:
GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.
Respondent:
DEPUY SYNTHES COMPANIES , DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS LLC and DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
