Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Bethel et al v. Muhammad et al
as 1:2010cv00654
Plaintiff:
Orlando Bethel and Glynis Bethel
Defendant:
Barbara Muhammad, City of Mobile, Regina Cason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethel et al v. Wise et al
as 1:2010cv00652
Plaintiff:
Orlando Bethel and Glynis Bethel
Defendant:
A. Kelli Wise, Lane W. Mann, Jody Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethel et al v. Baldwin County Department of Human Resources et al
as 1:2010cv00614
Plaintiff:
Orlando Bethel and Glynis Bethel
Defendant:
Baldwin County Department of Human Resources, Bob Riley, State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orlando Bethel, et al v. Escambia County Florida, et al
as 10-15112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ORLANDO BETHEL and GLYNIS BETHEL
Defendant - Appellee:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLORIDA, RON MCNESBY, JOEL MOONEYHAM and others
:
SERVICE
Bethel et al v. The City of Mobile, Alabama et al
as 1:2010cv00535
Plaintiff:
Glynis Bethel and Orlando Bethel
Defendant:
The City of Mobile, Alabama, Sam Jones, Michael Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethel et al v. Partin et al
as 1:2010cv00530
Plaintiff:
Orlando Bethel and Glynis Bethel
Defendant:
Charles C. Partin and Mark Seymour Boardman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glynis Bethel v. Sheriff Mack
as 10-12915
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLYNIS BETHEL
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF HUEY MACK, Huey Mack, Jr., "Hoss" Mack, in his official and individual capacity as the Sheriff of Baldwin County, Alabama,, a.k.a. Huey "Hoss" Mack, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
