Cases 1 - 10 of 29
GODINEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv26741
Plaintiff:
IVAN GODINEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GODINEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv28581
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA GODINEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GODINEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv21861
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO GODINEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GODINEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19198
Plaintiff:
MACARIO GODINEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GODINEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09329
Plaintiff:
JUAN GODINEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRAY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08807
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BRAY, ROBERT DAVIES, STEVEN ALON FLOWERS HART and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GODINEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23133
Plaintiff:
ERIC GODINEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Palacios Godinez v. GTE Financial Credit Union
as 8:2022cv02326
Plaintiff:
Nanci J. Palacios Godinez
Defendant:
GTE Financial Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Godinez v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00456
Petitioner:
Ricardo Calleros Godinez
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
GODINEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58347
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO GODINEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
