Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Eutelsat S.A. v. Intelsat Inflight LLC
as 1:2022cv04788
Plaintiff:
Eutelsat S.A.
Defendant:
Intelsat Inflight LLC f/k/a Gogo LLC, Intelsat Inflight LLC and Gogo LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Aperture Net LLC v. Gogo LLC
as 1:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
Aperture Net LLC
Defendant:
Gogo LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04241
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Linksmart Wireless Technology LLC v. Gogo Inc, et al
as 8:2018cv00654
Defendant:
Gogo Inc. and Gogo LLC
Plaintiff:
Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC
Salameno v. Gogo Inc.
as 16-3489
Defendant / Appellee:
Gogo LLC and Gogo Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Maria-Angela Sanzone, Charles Salameno and John Jensen, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Salameno v. Gogo Inc.
as 16-3489
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Salameno, Maria-Angela Sanzone and John Jensen, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Gogo Inc. and Gogo LLC
Salameno et al v. Gogo Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00487
Plaintiff:
Salameno, John Jensen, Maria-Angela Sanzone and others
Defendant:
Gogo Inc, Gogo LLC and Gogo Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Berkson v. Gogo LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01199
Plaintiff:
Adam Berkson, Kerry Welsh and Berkson
Defendant:
Gogo Inc. and Gogo LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Carucel Investments, L.P. v. Gogo, Inc. et al
as 0:2014cv60363
Plaintiff:
Carucel Investments, L.P.
Defendant:
Gogo, Inc., Gogo LLC and Aircell Business Aviation Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
