Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Sturm v. Goldey et al
as 5:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Karl Jacob Sturm
Defendant:
FNU Goldey, FNU Bouche, FNU Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparks v. Gulickson et al
as 5:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Timothy William Sparks and Timothy William Schwanz
Defendant:
FNU Gulickson, FNU Bouche, FNU Goldey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Goldey
as 5:2023cv01064
Petitioner:
Lee Earnest Price, III
Respondent:
Kris Goldey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nunley v. Goldey
as 23-6164
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES EARL NUNLEY, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN GOLDEY
Spalding v. Administrative Offfices of the US Courts et al
as 5:2023cv00905
Petitioner:
David L Spalding
Respondent:
Administrative Offfices of the US Courts and Federal Public Defenders Office
Defendant:
Administration Office of the US Courts and Warden FNU Goldey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
GOLDEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15311
Plaintiff:
MARK GOLDEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Danmola v. Goldey
as 5:2023cv00825
Petitioner:
Yusufu Danmola
Respondent:
Warden Goldey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Walters v. Goldey
as 5:2023cv00796
Petitioner:
Mark Walters
Respondent:
Kris Goldey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Goodwin v. Goldey
as 5:2023cv00773
Petitioner:
Eullis Monroe Goodwin
Respondent:
Kris Goldey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Devers v. Goldey
as 5:2023cv00731
Petitioner:
Marquis Deron Devers
Respondent:
FNU Goldey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
