Cases 1 - 10 of 831
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Membache, Jimmy v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv21255
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Gonzales Membache
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Deandre Arnold v. Hillsborough County Sheriff, et al
as 24-10634
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant:
CHAD CHRONISTER, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SHERIFF, ADRIEL GONZALES and others
Dunning v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Walter T. Dunning
Defendant:
Sgt. Gonzales and Officer Stack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arnold v. Chronister et al
as 8:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Deandre Arnold
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad Chronister, Deputy Adriel Gonzales, Deputy Baez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brenda Giron Gonzales v. U.S. Attorney General
as 23-14180
Petitioner:
BRENDA GIRON GONZALES
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Baciealupo v. MV Communications Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv24886
Plaintiff:
Gianfranco Baciealupo
Defendant:
MV Communications Group, Inc. and Carlos Javier Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
GONZALES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34005
Plaintiff:
REY GONZALES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GONZALES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34001
Plaintiff:
PABLO GONZALES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GONZALES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34224
Plaintiff:
VICTOR GONZALES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
