Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Escobedo v. Gonzales, et al.
as 1:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Omar Escobedo
Defendant:
Kiera Burgin Gonzales, Sgt. Gresick, Sgt. J. Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00102
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gonzales et al v. Burley High School et al
as 4:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
Jorge Gonzales , A. G. , Todd Merrell and others
Defendant:
Burley High School , Cassia Joint School District 151 , Galen Smyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDowell v. Jefferson County et al
as 4:2015cv00507
Plaintiff:
Preston Dale McDowell
Defendant:
Jefferson County , Blair Olsen , Steve Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Romos-Gonzales v. USA
as 1:2015cv00005
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Romos-Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Gonzales
as 1:2012cv00056
Defendant:
Marcelino Muri Gonzales, Sr
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Bach v. Idaho State Board of Medicine et al
as 4:2010cv00548
Plaintiff:
John N. Bach and Cindy Lee Bach
Defendant:
Idaho State Board of Medicine, Steve J. Wright, Wright, John, Tolson, and Wayne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bach v. Idaho State Board of Medicine et al
as 1:2010cv00548
Plaintiff:
John N. Bach and Cindy Lee Bach
Defendant:
Idaho State Board of Medicine, Steve J. Wright, Wright, John, Tolson, and Wayne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Shi v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv00160
Plaintiff:
Fang Shi
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emelio Gonzales, Robert S Muller and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
