Cases 31 - 40 of 87
Moore et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 5:2014cv00965
Plaintiff:
Loretta Moore , Cynthia Birk-Alcorn , Jeff Alcorn and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Austin et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 5:2014cv00391
Plaintiff:
Arthur Austin , Charles Burkes , Ethel Caldwell and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation , Glaxosmithkline LLC , Aryan Kadivar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Fox
as 5:2013cv01280
Petitioner:
James Lee Williams, II
Respondent:
John B Fox, Charles E Samuels, Jr, J A Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Golden v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2013cv01034
Plaintiff:
Brent Golden
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Pottawatomie County of, David Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
McClesky et al v. CR Bard Inc
as 5:2013cv00849
Plaintiff:
Hayley McClesky , Nereida Cintron , Pamela Adams and others
Defendant:
CR Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Gonzales et al v. Putnam City Schools Independent School District I-001
as 5:2013cv00610
Plaintiff:
David Gonzales
Defendant:
Putnam City Schools Independent School District I-001
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
