Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gonzalez v. Johnson
as 5:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Kanisha Gonzalez
Defendant:
Carl Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Mac Donald Gonzalez v. Peterson
as 2:2017cv00208
Petitioner:
Hector Guillermo Smith Mac Donald Gonzalez
Respondent:
Whitney Merlynn Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11603
Hutt v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 2:2014cv00209
Plaintiff:
Robert Donald Hutt
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Iman Gonzalez, Keith Ivens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center et al
as 5:2013cv00309
Plaintiff:
Clifton A. Matthews
Defendant:
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, John D. Seigne and Jorge L. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nawaz v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv00009
Plaintiff:
Malik M. Nawaz and Malik M. Nawaz
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Paul E. Novak, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Boggero v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv00204
Plaintiff:
Giovanna Boggero and Giovanna Boggero
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Paul E. Novak, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Huang v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2007cv00110
Plaintiff:
Haiquan Huang
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Paul Novak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
