Cases 41 - 50 of 124
Wells v. Rosenblum et al
as 2:2016cv01403
Defendant:
Robyn M. Anderson, Vicki Applegate, Kelly Ashton and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruelas et al v. Padre Properties, LLC
as 1:2016cv01372
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Alexander Gomez, Juan Gonzalez and Maricela Ruelas
Defendant:
Padre Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Charlton v. Yepez et al
as 2:2016cv00901
Defendant:
Sgt. Arguello, S. Bruning, J. Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Shane Charlton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Nooth
as 2:2016cv00278
Petitioner:
C. Blanket Gonzalez-Aguilera
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Unknown:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Nooth
as 2:2015cv02126
Petitioner:
Guadalupe Gonzalez
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. Pavilion Construction NW LLC, et al
as 3:2015cv02114
Plaintiff:
Hugo Gonzalez Perez
Defendant:
P R Drywall LLC, Pavilion Construction NW LLC and Pavilion Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01607
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Peters
as 1:2015cv01476
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gonzalez-Aguilera
Defendant:
C. Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Gaytan
as 2:2015cv01416
Defendant:
Jacqueline Gaytan
Plaintiff:
David Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fulton v. Koskinen et al
as 6:2015cv01359
Defendant:
L. Andrist, Ester E. Crawl-Bey, L. Glass and others
Plaintiff:
George Lyle Fulton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
