Cases 1 - 10 of 122
Ayala v. NYC Human Resources Administration
as 24-1196
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN AYALA
Defendant:
NYC HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION, JAMIE ESPARZA, EL PASO DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Ayala v. NYC Human Resources Administration et al
as 1:2024cv02444
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Ayala
Defendant:
NYC Human Resources Administration, Jamie Esparza, El Paso District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Barandica v. Advanced Pediatrics P.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Niset Barandica
Defendant:
Advanced Pediatrics P.C., Yolanda Sabogal, Gonzalo Sabogal and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Villa-Camacho v. Garland
as 23-7226
Petitioner:
CESAR GONZALO VILLA-CAMACHO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rivera Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv07841
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Rivera Garcia
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Villegas v. La Casa Del Mofongo, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07768
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Ramirez Villegas
Defendant:
La Casa Del Mofongo, Inc., Jose Felix Cabrera and Miosotis N. Cabrera
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Contreras et al v. Timinelli et al
as 2:2023cv03531
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Contreras, Jose A. Mendez and Wilfredo Juarez
Defendant:
Peter Timinelli and Pete Timinelli Landsaping, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Villa-Camacho v. Garland
as 23-6104
Petitioner:
CESAR GONZALO VILLA-CAMACHO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzalo et al v. Rico Pollo #2 Restaurant, Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv06258
Plaintiff:
Abreu Gonzalo and Divaris Miguelina Mendez
Defendant:
Rico Pollo #2 Restaurant, Corp. and Juan F Puntiel
Fila-Naula v. Garland
as 22-6473
Petitioner:
GONZALO EDWIN FILA-NAULA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.