Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Crowe et al v. AMD Welding Services, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Matthew Crowe, Jonathan Thomas, Jesse Kirk and others
Defendant:
AMD Welding Services, LLC, Derek Abbott and Amber Abbott
Keymolent v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02672
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Keymolent
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barahona v. Indian River Transport Co. et al
as 1:2019cv03778
Defendant:
David Hill, Heritage Management Group Inc. and Indian River Transport Co.
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Barahona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gallegos v. Stone Cre8tions, Inc.
as 1:2016cv03203
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Gallegos
Defendant:
Stone Cre8tions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Ortega et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2016cv01689
Plaintiff:
Blanca Ortega and Gonzalo Ahumada
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alvarez et al v. Artistic Concrete of Georgia, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01216
Plaintiff:
Adrian Alvarez , Adrian Alvarez, Jr. , Alexis Fierro and others
Defendant:
Artistic Concrete of Georgia, Inc. and Joe Hall
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Alvarez et al v. Artistic Concrete of Georgia, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01996
Plaintiff:
Adrian Alvarez , Adrian Alvarez, Jr. , Alexis Fierro and others
Defendant:
Artistic Concrete of Georgia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Campos-Bailon v. United States
as 1:2013cv01770
Petitioner:
Gonzalo Campos-Bailon
Respondent:
United States
Hernandez v. Woodman Insulation Co., Inc.
as 1:2009cv00777
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Hernandez
Defendant:
Woodman Insulation Co., Inc. and Woodman Insulation Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) Labor - Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
