Cases 1 - 7 of 7
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ONE BOYERTOWN PROPERTIES LP et al
as 5:2020cv06249
Defendant:
CARE HSL NEWTOWN PROPCO, LP, J. RANDOLPH PARRY ARCHITECTS, P.C., AMC DELANCEY TRADITIONS OF HERSHEY PARTNERS, LP and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
3Rd Party Defendant:
Roy Larry Schein & Associates, Hospitaler Sisters of Mercy, CCA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Goodfellow et al v. Camp Netimus, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01521
Plaintiff:
Gordon Parker Goodfellow, IV , Gordon Parker Goodfellow, III and Lorena Goodfellow
Defendant:
Camp Netimus, Inc. , Candace Kay Lehman and Lisa M Chou (Brass)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MESSINA et al v. OXFORD VALLEY CARDIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C. et al
as 2:2016cv01008
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE MESSINA , SHERRY GOODFELLOW , AMANDA DALY and others
Defendant:
OXFORD VALLEY CARDIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C. , RANGA RAO , SADHANA RAO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MCNEAL et al v. ARCELORMITTAL USA, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv03534
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MCNEAL , CHRISTINE MCNEAL , SEAN FLOOD and others
Defendant:
ARCELORMITTAL USA, INC. , ARCELORMITTAL PLATE LLC , ARCELORMITTAL USA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
MCNEAL et al v. ARCELORMITTAL USA, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv03517
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MCNEAL , CHRISTINE MCNEAL , SEAN FLOOD and others
Defendant:
ARCELORMITTAL USA, INC. , ARCELORMITTAL PLATE LLC , ARCELORMITTAL USA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
MCCRACKEN v. CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv02039
Plaintiff:
TED A. MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, INTERNATIONAL BIO-ANALYTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC., GLENN A. COX and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
