Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Norman et al v. Oticon, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00827
Defendant:
ES Diagnostics, Inc., Oticon, Inc., WDH USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ron Worth Norman and Barbara Ellen Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Richardson v. Polk
as 2:2022cv02465
Plaintiff:
Gordon Richardson
Defendant:
Letrone Polk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Hamilton v. J. B. Hunt Transport, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Mr. Walter Charles Hamilton and Walter Charles Hamilton, Jr
Defendant:
J. B. Hunt Transport, Inc., J. B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. and Douglas Gordon Bostrom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Arnold et al v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv01254
Plaintiff:
Karey Gordon Arnold and Allen Dale Walker
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Larock v. Crosby et al
as 2:2019cv00031
Plaintiff:
Gordon Larock
Defendant:
EAN Holdings, LLC and Marvin Haden Crosby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bobo v. Gates et al
as 3:2019cv00116
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Bobo
Defendant:
Brian Gordon Gates and Werner Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bell et al v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00074
Defendant:
Ross Dress for Less, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sara T. Bell and Gordon Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baugh v. Schuster et al
as 3:2018cv01214
Defendant:
Charlie Gray, Raven Schuster and Gordon Stovall
Plaintiff:
David Baugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gordon v. Baggett
as 2:2018cv02178
Plaintiff:
George Thomas Gordon
Defendant:
William Boyce Baggett
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nichols v. Trucking, LLC, et al.
as 2:2016cv02228
Plaintiff:
Gordon Nichols
Defendant:
C&K Trucking, LLC , Doyle E Bradburn, Jr. and John Does 1-5
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
