Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Doe 1 et al v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al
as 1:2023cv10301
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3 and others
Defendant:
Government of the United States Virgin Islands, First Lady Cecile De Jongh, Governor Kenneth Mapp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2022cv10904
Plaintiff:
Government of the United States Virgin Islands
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Not Classified By Court:
Jordana H. Feldman, Epstein Victims Compensation Program and Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
3Rd Party Defendant:
James Edward Staley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe 1 v. Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 1:2022cv10018
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Government of the United States Virgin Islands
Consolidated Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Not Classified By Court:
Epstein Victims Compensation Program and Jordana H. Feldman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration v. Ocean Food Mart, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06573
Plaintiff:
Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration, an Agency of the Government of the United States of America and Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration
Defendant:
Ocean Food Mart, Inc., Joy Lo, Wei Qiang Zhang and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Rytlewski v. Government of The United State
as 20-4006
Defendant / Appellee:
Government of The United States
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Allen Rytlewski
Rytlewski v. Government of The United States
as 1:2020cv08543
Defendant:
Government of The United States
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Rytlewski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration v. Contessa et al
as 1:2019cv06127
Defendant:
CBL Motor Car Corp., Design Plumbing and Heating Services, Gerard Contessa and others
Plaintiff:
Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration, an Agency of the Government of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration, an Agency of the Government of the United States of America v. Barrie et al
as 1:2019cv06037
Defendant:
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, New York City Department of Finance Parking Violations Bureau, Amadu Barrie and others
Plaintiff:
Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration, an Agency of the Government of the United States of America and Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration, an Agency of the Government of the United States of America v. Rickles et al
as 2:2019cv05892
Defendant:
Peter A. Rickles, Rickles Lincoln-Mercury, LLC, Ford Motor Credit Company and others
Counter Claimant:
Belinda Rickles
Plaintiff:
Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration, an Agency of the Government of the United States of America and Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration, an Agency of the Government of the United States of America v. Car Container Lines, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05694
Defendant:
Car Container Lines, Inc., Galina Perstin, Oleg Perstin and others
Plaintiff:
Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration, an Agency of the Government of the United States of America and Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
