Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Digital Media Solutions, LLC v. South University of Ohio, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00145
Defendant:
South University of Ohio, LLC, DCEH Education Holdings, LLC, DC South University of Ohio LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Digital Media Solutions, LLC
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Buncher Company, Stephanie Porreca, Historic Berriman-Morgan, LLC and others
Intervenor:
Benefit Administrative Systems, LLC, Thomas J Perrelli, U.S. Bank, National Association and others
Interested Party:
HEFCO Meadowbrook LLC, Store SPE 1200 Lincoln, LLC, 3601 Sunflower LLC and others
Receiver:
Mark E. Dottore
Petitioner:
Douglas Emmett 2010, llc
Amicus Curiae:
United States
Respondent:
Mark A. Kompa and FSP Pacific Center LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hung Ha v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 10-16506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HUNG HA
Defendant - Appellant:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, SHERIFF OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, BERKELEY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Ha v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 3:2009cv05281
Plaintiff:
Hung Ha
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Department of Labor, Sheriff of Alameda County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fidelity National Title & Escrow of Hawaii, Inc., v. James et al
as 1:2008cv00160
Plaintiff:
Fidelity National Title & Escrow of Hawaii, Inc.,, Fidelity National Title & Escrow of Hawaii, Inc., and Fidelity National Title & Escrow of Hawaii, Inc.,
Defendant:
David Leal James, Glenda Vivian James, Graham Thomas Fraser and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
THOMAS v. MORAFATES et al
as 2:2007cv04605
Plaintiff:
GRAHAM THOMAS
Defendant:
SHELDON BRYAN COMPANIES, INC., ANDREW MORAFATES, SHELDON BRYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sheldon Bryan Companies v. Thomas
as 3:2007cv01010
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Bryan Companies and Sheldon Bryan Companies
Defendant:
Graham Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
