Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Dye v. McIntosh County et al
as 6:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jason Grant Dye
Defendant:
McIntosh County and Kevin Ledbetter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dye v. McIntosh County et al
as 6:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jason Grant Dye
Defendant:
McIntosh County, Kevin Ledbetter, Monica Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandt v. Cimarron Correctional Facility and Staff et al
as 5:2023cv01163
Plaintiff:
Donna R Brandt
Defendant:
Cimarron Correctional Facility and Staff, Terrace Dickerson, FNU Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brandt v. Dickerson et al
as 5:2023cv00800
Plaintiff:
Donna R Brandt
Defendant:
Terrace Dickerson, FNU Grant, FNU Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dudley v. Hiniger et al
as 5:2023cv00687
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Lewis Dudley
Defendant:
Damon Hiniger, Clayton Johnson, Terrence Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tisdale v. USA
as 5:2023cv00665
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Larry Grant Tisdale, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Dudley v. Hiniger et al
as 4:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Dudley and Dewayne Lewis Dudley
Defendant:
Damon T Hininger, United States Marshals Service, Terrencce Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaquez v. Dallis et al
as 6:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Henry Joseph Jaquez
Defendant:
Rachel Dallis, Jason Chenault, Johnny Dallis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Harpe
as 5:2023cv00147
Petitioner:
Cody Grant Williams
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Farrell v. Breidenstein et al
as 5:2022cv00978
Plaintiff:
Robert Farrell
Defendant:
FNU Breidenstein, FNU Ferrell, FNU Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
