Cases 31 - 36 of 36
Spagnola v. Great Northern Insurance Compa
as 10-1374
Petitioner:
Fred Spagnola, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Respondent:
Great Northern Insurance Company, Federal Insurance Company, John D. Finnegan and others
-RML Chubb & Son Inc., et al v. Kelleher, et al
as 0:1992cv04484
Cross Defendant:
Nicholas Addesa, Chubb & Son Inc., Criterion Bead and Novelty Corp. and others
Defendant:
Nicholas Addesa, All American Poly Corp., Claire Baruch and others
Interested Party:
Virginia K. Beigel, Christina K. Taylor and Michelle K. Williamson
Counter Defendant:
Chubb & Son Inc., Chubb & Son Inc. and Federal Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Chubb & Son Inc., Federal Insurance Company, Great Northern Insurance Company and others
Trustee:
Patricia Dzikowski
561) 470-5405 (fax:
Marilyn Forem
Counter Claimant:
M.F Bank & Co., Inc., Simon Taub and Techknits, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
M.F Bank & Co., Inc., Simon Taub, Simon Taub and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
JOHNSON v. CALLAGHAN et al
as 2:2008cv05228
Plaintiff:
SOLOMON JOHNSON
Defendant:
ANDREW CALLAGHAN, ANDREW CALLAGHAN, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Great Northern Insurance Company v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 3:2008mc80191
Plaintiff:
Great Northern Insurance Company
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Great Northern Insurance Company et al v. Yellow Transportation, Inc.
as 1:2008cv01981
Plaintiff:
Great Northern Insurance Company and Avcon Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Yellow Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Bernstein v. The Chubb Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00193
Plaintiff:
Jonathan A. Bernstein
Defendant:
The Chubb Corporation, Federal Insurance Company, Great Northern Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
