Cases 1 - 4 of 4
GREATER METROPOLITAN HOTEL EMPLOYERS-EMPLOYEES HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND et al v. ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01584
Plaintiff:
GREATER METROPOLITAN HOTEL EMPLOYERS-EMPLOYEES HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , MINNESOTA CEMENT MASONS HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and ROOFERS LOCAL 96 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., TEIKOKU PHARMA USA, INC., TEIKOKU SEIYAKU CO. LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
GREATER METROPOLITAN HOTEL EMPLOYERS-EMPLOYEES HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, LOCAL 17 HOSPITALITY BENEFIT FUND AND ROOFERS LOCAL 96 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2013cv04165
Plaintiff:
GREATER METROPOLITAN HOTEL EMPLOYERS-EMPLOYEES HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, LOCAL 17 HOSPITALITY BENEFIT FUND AND ROOFERS LOCAL 96 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES , ABBOTT RESPIRATORY LLC, ABBIVE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Bakers Local 433 Health Fund, et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02612
Plaintiff:
Bakers Local 433 Health Fund , TWIN CITIES BAKERY WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , Graphic Communications Local 1B Health and Welfare Fund "A" and others
Defendant:
PFIZER INC , PFIZER IRELAND PHARMACEUTICALS , WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff:
A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner:
MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master:
JOSE L. LINARES
In Re:
LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court:
FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor:
MYLAN INC.
Interested Party:
CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
