Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Ezell v. Cole, et al
as 24-6025
Plaintiff:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant:
DAVID COLE, Warden GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU RUSSELL, L/T, Mr., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU COOPER, L/T, Ms., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual capacity and others
Johnson v. Giles, et al
as 23-1268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GILES, TONCHIE, CARPENTER and others
Ezell v. Cole, et al
as 23-6110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID COLE, Warden GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU RUSSELL, L/T, Mr., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU ROGERS, L/T, Mr., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual capacity and others
Green v. Hudson
as 23-3141
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY MARTIN GREEN
Respondent / Appellee:
D. HUDSON, Warden, USP-Leavenworth
Johnson v. Giles, et al
as 23-1096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GILES, TONCHIE, CARPENTER and others
Green v. State of Oklahoma
as 22-6213
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVE O'NEAL GREEN
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Partridge v. Pelle, et al
as 22-1186
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN PARTRIDGE
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE PELLE, BRUCE HAAS, JEFFREY GOETZ and others
Johnson v. Green, et al
as 22-1019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GREEN, YULU, RAEL and others
Salazar v. Green, et al
as 16-1358
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY GILBERT SALAZAR
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVEN GREEN and CYNTHIA H. COFFMAN, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Howard v. Raemisch, et al
as 15-1451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY D. HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, or Current Executive Director of CDOC, PAMELA PLOUGH, or Current Warden of Canon Minimum Center-ACC, FMCC, SCC, JOHN SUTHERS, or The Current Colorado Attorney General and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
