Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Vaught v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv00507
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Vaught
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Green Bankshares, Inc., GreenBank and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
United States of America v. Greenbank Account XXX3023 et al
as 3:2011cv00448
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Greenbank Account xxx3023, Regions Bank Account XXXXX4559, FSG Bank Account X8881 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00210
In_re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Flex Yield Investments, LLC v. GreenBank et al
as 3:2010cv00052
Plaintiff:
Flex Yield Investments, LLC
Defendant:
GreenBank, Wood Ridge Investments, LLC and Wood Ridge Development, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
United States of America v. $22,226.25 in Interbank FX Account No. xxxx0172 et al
as 3:2009cv00607
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$22,226.25 in Interbank FX Account No. xxx0172 and $35,756.64 in Greenbank Account No. xxx1788
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
GreenBank v. Southern Boys Investment Group, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00549
Plaintiff:
GreenBank
Defendant:
Southern Boys Investment Group, LLC, Christopher Mohr, John L Rocker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
United States of America et al v. Land in Maury County, Tennessee, Easements and Rights-of-Way over 0.76 Acre, More or Less et al
as 1:2009cv00010
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America, Tennessee Valley Authority and others
Defendant:
Land in Maury County, Tennessee, Easements and Rights-of-Way over 0.76 Acre, More or Less, Cornerstone Land Company, GreenBank and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
