Cases 21 - 30 of 91
McCassey v. Hamilton
as 1:2015cv00373
Defendant:
Sheriff Greg Hamilton
Plaintiff:
William Andrew McCassey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholas v. Hamilton
as 1:2015cv00323
Respondent:
Greg Hamilton
Petitioner:
Melvin Nicholas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Patton v. Hamilton
as 1:2015cv00299
Respondent:
Greg Hamilton
Petitioner:
Ronald D. Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gentry v. Hamilton
as 1:2015cv00275
Petitioner:
Michael Gentry
Respondent:
Sheriff Greg Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
James v. Hamilton
as 1:2015cv00253
Defendant:
Greg Hamilton
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Michael J. James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Alexander v. Greg Hamilton, et al
as 15-50258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF GREG HAMILTON, DEPUTY PARKER, SERGEANT HARRISON and others
Nichols v. Hamilton et al
as 1:2015cv00237
Defendant:
Mrs. Brubaker, Kathryn N. Geiger, Sheriff Greg Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Lester Paul Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. The State of Texas et al
as 1:2015cv00193
Defendant:
David Escamilla, Sheriff Greg Hamilton, Rosemary Lehmberg and others
Plaintiff:
Michael J. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. Hamilton
as 1:2015cv00184
Respondent:
Sheriff Greg Hamilton
Petitioner:
Efrain Quiroz Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Patton v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2015cv00164
Defendant:
County Attorney David Escamilla, Travis CountySheriff Greg Hamilton, District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
