Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Gregory Andre Smith v. Danny Samuels
as 2:2021cv05651
Petitioner:
Gregory Andre Smith
Respondent:
Danny Samuels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Birch et al v. Barshefsky et al
as 5:2018cv02051
Plaintiff:
Margaret Birch , Matthew J. Covey , Thomas Lesnau and others
Defendant:
Charlene Barshefsky , Andy D. Bryant , Aneel Bhusri and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Salsberg v. Krzanich et al
as 5:2018cv01543
Plaintiff:
Martin Salsberg
Defendant:
Brian M. Krzanich , Robert H. Swan , Andy D. Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE INTEL CORPORATION SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
as 5:2018cv01489
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lipovich
Defendant:
Brian M. Krzanich , Robert H. Swan , Andy D. Bryant and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Martin Salsberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gregory J. Smith
as 5:2018mc00002
Petitioner:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Respondent:
Gregory J. Smith
Smith v. Hedgpeth et al
as 5:2016cv01269
Plaintiff:
Gregory Andre Smith
Defendant:
R. Machuca, Jr., M. Zornes, M. Roennmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Kumar et al
as 1:2015cv05720
Plaintiff:
Gregory Andre Smith
Defendant:
K. Kumar and L. Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tivoli LLC et al v. Targetti Sankey S p A et al
as 8:2014cv01285
Defendant:
Marie Birmingham, Targetti Sankey S p A, Targetti Poulsen USA Inc and others
Counter Defendant:
Peter Jang and Jann Huang Jang
Plaintiff:
Tivoli LLC, Neo-Neon Led USA Holdings Ltd and American Lighting Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Smith v. Hedgpeth et al
as 4:2013cv01052
Plaintiff:
Gregory Andre Smith
Defendant:
Anthony Hedgpeth, L. Trexler, M. Roennmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Salinas Valley State Prison Guards
as 4:2011cv04467
Plaintiff:
Gregory Andre Smith
Defendant:
Salinas Valley State Prison Guards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
