Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Van Huisen v. Desantis, et al.
as 24-2616
Plaintiff:
GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, DONALD J. TRUMP, MARC RUBIO and others
Van Huisen v. Chief of Staff, et al.
as 24-1529
Plaintiff:
GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN
Defendant:
CHIEF OF STAFF, White House, DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, White House and JOSEPH R. BIDEN, United States President
Van Huisen v. Warner Brothers, et al.
as 24-964
Plaintiff:
GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN
Defendant:
WARNER BROTHERS, Time Warner and LEONARDO DICAPRIO
Van Huisen v. United States House of Representatives, et al.
as 24-898
Plaintiff:
GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and MIKE JOHNSON, House Speaker
Van Huisen v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-842
Plaintiff:
GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PR, CLINTON ADMINISTRATION, K. BIEKER, CEO, CCC and others
Van Huisen v. Clinton Administration, et al.
as 24-401
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN
Defendant / Appellee:
CLINTON ADMINISTRATION, WILLIAM CLINTON, ED CORNEILUIS, Dealership Owner, Volkswagen, Santa Clara, Alameda County and others
(PC) Van Huisen v. House of Representatives
as 2:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Defendant:
House of Representatives and Mike Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Van Huisen v. Nelson
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Defendant:
Bill Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Van Huisen v. Rosenburg et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Defendant:
Chuck Rosenburg and DEA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Van Huisen v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Defendant:
United States of America, Clinton Administration, K. Bieker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
