Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Grill Concepts Services, Inc. dba Daily Grill v. National Labor Relations Board
as 23-361
Petitioner:
GRILL CONCEPTS SERVICES, INC. DBA DAILY GRILL
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
National Labor Relations Board v. Grill Concepts Services, Inc. dba Daily Grill
as 23-78
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
GRILL CONCEPTS SERVICES, INC. DBA DAILY GRILL
Mori Rubin v. Grill Concepts Services, Inc.
as 22-55620
Petitioner:
MORI PAM RUBIN, Regional Director of Region 31 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
GRILL CONCEPTS SERVICES, INC., DBA The Daily Grill
Mori Rubin v. Grill Concepts Services, Inc.
as 2:2021cv09245
Petitioner:
Mori Rubin
Respondent:
Grill Concepts Services, Inc. doing business as The Daily Grill
NLRB v. Grill Concepts Services, Inc.
as 17-1121
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Grill Concepts Services, Inc., d/b/a The Daily Grill
Grill Concepts Services, Inc. v. NLRB
as 17-1100
Petitioner:
Grill Concepts Services, Inc., d/b/a The Daily Grill
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Intervenor For Respondent:
Unite Here Local 11
NLRB v. Grill Concepts Services, Inc.
as 16-1287
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Grill Concepts Services, Inc., d/b/a The Daily Grill
Grill Concepts Services, Inc. v. NLRB
as 16-1238
Petitioner:
Grill Concepts Services, Inc., d/b/a The Daily Grill
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Unite Here Local 11
Jerome et al v. Grill Concepts, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv20024
Plaintiff:
Todd Jerome , Malik White , Jennifer Gilner and others
Defendant:
Grill Concepts, Inc. , Grill Concepts Services, Inc.. , Robert Spivak and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Johns v. Grill Concept Services, Inc.
as 4:2012cv00639
Plaintiff:
David Johns
Defendant:
Grill Concept Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
