Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Gross v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv01722
Plaintiff:
Frederick Gross
Defendant:
James C Johnson and County of Suffolk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grosse-Rhode v. James et al
as 9:2023cv01474
Plaintiff:
Keir A. Grosse-Rhode and Anthony Grosse-Rhode
Defendant:
Ms. Letitia James and Daniel F. Martuscello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grosse-Rhode v. Annucci et al
as 1:2022cv09343
Petitioner:
Keir A. Grosse-Rhode
Respondent:
Anthoney J. Annucci, Thomas J. Loughren and Department of Corrections and Community Supervision with Associated Press
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cisse v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
Ali Cisse
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Gregory King, Martin Snow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gross, Jr. v. Koeberle et al
as 1:2021cv01037
Plaintiff:
Jarrett C. Gross, Jr.
Defendant:
Joshua J. Koeberle, Daniel J. Cario, Scott E. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cano v. Hanna et al
as 1:2021cv07338
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hiram Cano
Defendant:
Christine Hanna, Placido Lopez, State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vives v. Bennett et al
as 1:2021cv06984
Plaintiff:
Luis Vives
Defendant:
Carl Bennett, Joseph Farrell and Michael Gross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gross v. Sanchez et al
as 2:2020cv04873
Defendant:
Christopher McPartland, James Burke, Thomas Spota III and others
Plaintiff:
James Gross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gross v. Johnson
as 7:2020cv07833
Petitioner:
Marcus Gross
Respondent:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gross v. Royce et al
as 2:2020cv03037
Respondent:
The Attorney General of New York and Superintendent Mr, M, Royce
Petitioner:
James Gross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
