Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
HALL v. HICKS et al
as 2:2023cv01752
Plaintiff:
SIVAJI HALL
Defendant:
MARCUS O HICKS, BRUCE DAVIS, JAMES STIGLIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCNEIL v. PASCUZZI et al
as 2:2023cv01725
Plaintiff:
HERBERT MCNEIL
Defendant:
ASHLEY M. PASCUZZI, GROSS POLOWY LLC., JODI ALPHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PEREZ et al v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK et al
as 2:2022cv04173
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff:
ALEJANDRO VICENTE PEREZ and CATHLEEN HANENBERG PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SIMS v. THE CITY OF TRENTON et al
as 3:2021cv12987
Defendant:
GROSS & GROSS, LLC PROCESS, GROSS & GROSS LLC and THE CITY OF TRENTON
Plaintiff:
MELVIN SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
