Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Fredrick Stemme et al v. Universal Protection Service, LP et al
as 8:2017cv00001
Plaintiff:
Rolain Alexis, William H. Davis, Jr, Mohammed Q. Mohiuddin and others
Defendant:
Does, Guardsmark LLC and Universal Protection Service LP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ragland v. Guardsmark, LLC
as 3:2014cv00693
Plaintiff:
Chauncy Ragland
Defendant:
Guardsmark, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Wright v. Guardsmark, LLC
as 5:2014cv01188
Plaintiff:
Mark Wright
Defendant:
Guardsmark, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tew v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 3:2013cv00608
Plaintiff:
Bryan Keith Tew
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation , Mr Wilson, Ohio Bureau of Workmens Compensation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv03190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Houle v. Guardsmark, LLC
as 5:2011cv02873
Plaintiff:
Lawerence L Houle
Defendant:
Guardsmark, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Henderson v. Guardsmark, LLC et al
as 5:2011cv01529
Plaintiff:
Linda R Henderson
Defendant:
Guardsmark, LLC and Guardsmark- GP, LLC
Mediator:
Andria S. Knapp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garth v. John Tennant Memorial-Episcopal Senior Communities (JTM-ESC) et al
as 3:2011cv00748
Plaintiff:
John Garth
Defendant:
John Tennant Memorial-Episcopal Senior Communities (JTM-ESC) , Vincent Cheung, Oak Center Towers Office Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garth v. John Tennant Memorial-Episcopal Senior Communities (JTM-ESC) et al
as 4:2011cv00748
Plaintiff:
John Garth
Defendant:
John Tennant Memorial-Episcopal Senior Communities (JTM-ESC), Vincent Cheung, Oak Center Towers Office Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
