Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Nieves-Conde v. Commonwealth of PR et al
as 3:2011cv01981
Plaintiff:
Santos Nieves-Conde
Defendant:
Commonwealth of PR, Noe Lugo and Guillermo Somoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Torres-Martinez v. Molina-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2011cv01207
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Torres-Martinez
Respondent:
Carlos M. Molina-Rodriguez, Guillermo Somoza and Jose Figueroa-Sancha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Estevez-Gonzalez v. Diaz-Pagan et al
as 3:2010cv02268
Plaintiff:
Pablo Estevez-Gonzalez
Defendant:
Juan Diaz-Pagan and Guillermo Somoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fortunato-Irizarry v. Diaz-Pagan et al
as 3:2010cv01894
Plaintiff:
Victor Fortunato-Irizarry
Defendant:
Juan Diaz-Pagan, Guillermo Somoza-Colombani and Ortiz Modesto-Montes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Orengo-Luciano v. Miranda-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2010cv01869
Plaintiff:
Moises E Orengo-Luciano
Defendant:
Jose L Miranda-Rodriguez and Guillermo Somoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rivera-Mercado v. Mojica-Vega et al
as 3:2010cv01790
Plaintiff:
Edwin Rivera-Mercado
Defendant:
Jorge O. Mojica-Vega, Guillermo Somoza-Colombani and Jose Figueroa-Sancha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rivera-Crespo v. Molina-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2010cv01579
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Rivera-Crespo
Defendant:
Carlos Molina-Rodriguez and Colombani Guillermo-Somoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramos-Cedeno v. Molina-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2010cv01567
Defendant:
Carlos Molina-Rodriguez and Colombani Guillermo-Somoza
Plaintiff:
Jesus A Ramos-Cedeno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rivera-Crespo v. Somoza
as 3:2010cv01522
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Rivera-Crespo
Defendant:
Guillermo Somoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maldonado-Pagan v. Administracion de Correccion et al
as 3:2010cv01488
Plaintiff:
Mariano Maldonado-Pagan
Defendant:
Administracion de Correccion and Guillermo Somoza-Colombanes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
