Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Nieves-Conde v. Commonwealth of PR et al
as 3:2011cv01981
Plaintiff:
Santos Nieves-Conde
Defendant:
Commonwealth of PR, Noe Lugo and Guillermo Somoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ruiz-Rodriguez v. Miranda-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2011cv01657
Plaintiff:
Arquelio Ruiz-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Jose Miranda-Rodriguez and Guillermo Somoza-Colombani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hernandez-Ramos v. Diaz-Pagan et al
as 3:2011cv01446
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J. Hernandez-Ramos
Defendant:
Juan A. Diaz-Pagan and Guillermo Somoza-Colombanes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Torres-Martinez v. Molina-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2011cv01207
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Torres-Martinez
Respondent:
Carlos M. Molina-Rodriguez, Guillermo Somoza and Jose Figueroa-Sancha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Estevez-Gonzalez v. Diaz-Pagan et al
as 3:2010cv02268
Plaintiff:
Pablo Estevez-Gonzalez
Defendant:
Juan Diaz-Pagan and Guillermo Somoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez-Melendez v. Fortuno et al
as 3:2010cv02044
Plaintiff:
Rosendo Rodriguez-Melendez
Defendant:
Luis G. Fortuno, Guillermo Somoza-Colombani, Carlos M. Molina-Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fortunato-Irizarry v. Diaz-Pagan et al
as 3:2010cv01894
Plaintiff:
Victor Fortunato-Irizarry
Defendant:
Juan Diaz-Pagan, Guillermo Somoza-Colombani and Ortiz Modesto-Montes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Orengo-Luciano v. Miranda-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2010cv01869
Plaintiff:
Moises E Orengo-Luciano
Defendant:
Jose L Miranda-Rodriguez and Guillermo Somoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rivera-Mercado v. Mojica-Vega et al
as 3:2010cv01790
Plaintiff:
Edwin Rivera-Mercado
Defendant:
Jorge O. Mojica-Vega, Guillermo Somoza-Colombani and Jose Figueroa-Sancha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cedeno-Ortiz v. Molina-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2010cv01754
Plaintiff:
Edwin Cedeno-Ortiz
Defendant:
Carlos Molina-Rodriguez and Guillermo Somoza-Colombani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
