Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Williams v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2017cv01912
Petitioner:
Eugene H Williams, Jr
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Williams v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2016cv00519
Petitioner:
Eugene H Williams, Jr
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Scholl v. Allen County Superior Court et al
as 6:2013cv00976
Plaintiff:
Lesley Marlin Scholl
Defendant:
Allen County Superior Court, Indiana Court of Appeals, Indiana Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Williams, et al
as 5:2013cv00097
Plaintiff:
Ruben Garcia
Defendant:
H Williams, III, NFN Jones, Joel A Gauna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 1:2010cv00129
Petitioner:
Tony Shane Peters
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID, Lonnie Johnson, E Benoit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. Quarterman et al
as 9:2010cv00041
Petitioner:
Tony Shane Peters
Respondent:
N. Quarterman, L Johnson, E Benoit and others
Defendant:
S Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. Quarterman et al
as 1:2010cv00132
Petitioner:
Tony Shane Peters
Respondent:
N. Quarterman, L Johnson, E Benoit and others
Defendant:
S Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. Quarterman et al
as 9:2010cv00050
Petitioner:
Tony Shane Peters
Respondent:
N. Quarterman, L Johnson, E Benoit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peters v. Quarterman et al
as 1:2010cv00130
Petitioner:
Tony Shane Peters
Respondent:
N. Quarterman, L Johnson, E Benoit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. United States of America
as 4:2010cv00667
Petitioner:
Eugene H Williams, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
