Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Chappell v. Haley
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Grady Eugene Chappell
Defendant:
Matt Haley
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Haley v. Brewer et al
as 1:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Russell Francis Haley
Defendant:
Franklin Brewer and Eddie Rogers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haley v. Brewer
as 3:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Russell Haley
Defendant:
Franklin Brewer
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haley v. Fife
as 4:2021cv00061
Plaintiff:
Darrel Haley and Lydia Haley
Defendant:
James Fife and John Does A, B and C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Logan v. Mississippi Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00035
Defendant:
Mississippi Dept of Corrections, John Doe, Haley Barbour and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney R. Logan
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haley v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv00587
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Haley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. USAA Insurance Agency, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00153
Plaintiff:
Haley Williams
Defendant:
USAA Insurance Agency, Inc. doing business as USAA Casualty Insurance Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00109
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00058
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Vardaman v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00932
Defendant:
Brandon Williams, Terry Haley, Walmart, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Corintha Luciana Vardaman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
