Cases 1 - 10 of 105
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1120
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Indiana, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Commonwealth of Kentucky, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1087
Petitioner:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of West Virginia, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
USA, et al v. Google LLC
as 24-5006
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of Arkansas, State of Florida and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Other:
Brad Greenspan
Central Maine Power Company, et al v. FERC
as 23-1335
Petitioner:
Central Maine Power Company, United Illuminating Company, Eversource Energy Service Company, on behalf of The Connecticut Light and Power Company, Public Service Company of New Hampshire, and NSTAR Electric Company and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
State of New York, et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 21-7078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of New York, District of Columbia, State of California and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Facebook, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America, American Antitrust Institute, Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court:
STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant:
NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner:
AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent:
BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1363
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
American Wind Energy Association, Advanced Energy Economy, American Lung Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
William D. Ruckelshaus, William K. Reilly, Philip Zoebisch and others
Murray Energy Corporation v. EPA, et al
as 16-1127
Intervenor:
American Public Health Association, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, State of California and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Andrew Wheeler, Gina McCarthy and others
Amicus Curiae:
Robert P. Mason, Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, Joel D. Blum and others
Petitioner:
Murray Energy Corporation
Eversource Energy Service Company v. FERC
as 23-1167
Petitioner:
Eversource Energy Service Company, on behalf of The Connecticut Light and Power Company, Public Service Company of New Hampshire, and NSTAR Electric Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Maine Lobstermen's Association v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al
as 22-5244
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Maine Lobstermen's Association
Not Yet Classified:
State of Maine Department of Marine Resources, Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association and District 4 Lodge of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Local Lodge 207
Defendant / Appellee:
National Marine Fisheries Service, Gina Raimondo, in her official capacity as Secretary of Commerce and Janet Coit, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator for Fisheries
Intervenor / Appellee:
Conservation Law Foundation, Center for Biological Diversity and Defenders of Wildlife
Amicus Curiae:
State of New Hampshire and Maine State Chamber of Commerce
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
