Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Hampton v. Harris
as 3:2019cv02861
Petitioner:
Prince V. Hampton
Respondent:
Warden Chae Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Incorporated Village of West Hampton Dunes, NY v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 1:2019op46055
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Incorporated Village of West Hampton Dunes, NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Town of East Hampton, NY v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 1:2019op46040
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Town of East Hampton, NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hampton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04202
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mark Hampton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02004
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Hampton v. Williams
as 4:2019cv01664
Petitioner:
William Douglas Hampton
Respondent:
Warden Mark K. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hampton v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
as 2:2019cv03111
Respondent:
Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Prince V. Hampton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Long-Hampton et al v. Walmart Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00286
Defendant:
John Doe(s), Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Walmart, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Hampton and Marzetta Long-Hampton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Long-Hampton et al v. Walmart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00064
Defendant:
John Doe, #1-3, John Doe, #7-9, Walmart Stores and others
Plaintiff:
David Hampton, Marzetta Long-Hampton and David Rowland Hampton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
