Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Eugene Schuler v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6531
Petitioner / Appellant:
EUGENE PETER SCHULER
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, VDOC
Eugene Schuler v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6406
Petitioner / Appellant:
EUGENE PETER SCHULER
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, VDOC
Orell Logan v. Ronald Angelone
as 23-6192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ORELL LOGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD J. ANGELONE, Prior Director, VDOC, GARY BASS, Prior Manager, CCS, VDOC, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, VDOC and others
Lamont Woods v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6107
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAMONT A. WOODS
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, VDOC
Joseph Fleming v. Harold Clarke
as 18-6210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH FLEMING
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, VDOC, JOHN WALRATH, Warden, C/O LUNDY and others
Kenneth Chatman v. Harold Clarke
as 17-7349
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH TYRONE CHATMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director VDOC
David Wayne Mixon v. Harold W. Clarke
as 17-7078
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE MIXON
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director VDOC
Paul Thompson, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 17-6504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL CLEVELAND THOMPSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, VDOC, DAVID B. EVERETT, Regional Operations Chief, VDOC Eastern Region, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Hamilton Swart, III v. Harold Clarke
as 16-6227
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAMILTON H. SWART, III
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, VDOC, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief Correctional Operations, FREDERICK SCHILLING, Director of Health Services and others
Edmundo Coto v. Harold Clarke
as 15-7544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDMUNDO M. COTO
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director VDOC, DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Operations, GREGORY HOLLOWAY, Superintendent/Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
