Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Harrell v. Lira et al
as 2:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Christopher D Harrell
Defendant:
Jeremy Lira, Daniel Shannon, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Security Sergeant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Harrell v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Sergeant and Grievance Manager et al
as 2:2022cv00273
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Grievance Manager Corrections Sergeant, George Daniel Ross, Jr and Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Sergeant and Grievance Manager
Plaintiff:
Christopher D Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Renaud et al v Ross et al
as 1:2022cv00212
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Administrative Sergeant, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Security Officer Olenick, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Security Officer Hansen and others
Plaintiff:
Paul A Renaud and Christopher D Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Harrell v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv00177
Defendant:
Corizon Health Incorporated Regional Director, Corizon Health Inc Facility Medical Director, Corizon Health Inc Health Services Administrator and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher D Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Harrell et al v. Shwartz et al
as 2:2017cv00165
Plaintiff:
Truman Boyd Harrell and Vickie R Harrell
Defendant:
Ian Shwartz, John Shwartz and Kathleen Shwartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrell v. Wyoming State Penitentiary Warden
as 2:2013cv00078
Petitioner:
Christopher David Harrell
Respondent:
Wyoming State Penitentiary Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
