Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Johnson v. Hawkins et al
as 1:2018cv02227
Defendant:
Kelly, Malanado, Hawkins and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laintz v. Correctional Health Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv02122
Defendant:
John Simmers, Streyle, Garnes and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Laintz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryland v. Director of the Bureau of Prison[s], The et al
as 1:2018cv01893
Defendant:
Director of the Bureau of Prison[s], The, Koch, Silva and others
Plaintiff:
Corey R. Ryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Ghiz et al
as 2:2018cv00466
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brian Hawkins
Defendant:
Adam F. Ghiz, D. Thornton, G. Cottle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Geary County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2018cv03076
Plaintiff:
Keith Lamauntt Hawkins
Defendant:
Geary County Sheriff's Office and Geary County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eikenberry (ID 89846) v. Seward County, Kansas et al
as 5:2017cv03150
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Eikenberry
Defendant:
Seward County, Kansas, Hubert C. Peterson, Fred Smalls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Hansen et al
as 1:2017cv01995
Petitioner:
Timothy P. Hawkins
Respondent:
Matthew Hansen and Cynthia Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawkins v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00552
Movant:
Alfred Lynn Hawkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hawkins v. United States of America
as 5:2015cv00106
Petitioner:
Richard Hawkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Leonard v. Haskell, et al
as 14-8092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEON A. LEONARD
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD HASKELL, Sweetwater County Detention Center Sheriff, RICK HAWKINS, Sweetwater County Detention Center Major, CRYSTALYN VALENCIANO, Sweetwater County Detention Center Lieutenant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
