Cases 21 - 30 of 124
Simmons et al v. Shapiro, et al
as 5:2020cv00883
Plaintiff:
Katelyn Simmons and Christine Simmons
Defendant:
County of Summit, Ohio, Teresa Stark, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hawkins v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02021
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00390
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Hawkins et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00947
Plaintiff:
Dana Hawkins and Michael Hawkins
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins v. Patton
as 1:2020cv00128
Plaintiff:
Don Nell Hawkins
Defendant:
AUSA Robert J. Patton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00551
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc
Plaintiff:
James Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Takoma Regional Hospital et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op46165
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Beverly Sackler, Mark Timney and others
Plaintiff:
Baptist Womens Health Center, LLC, Lexington Hospital Corporation, Amisub (SFH), Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Hawkins et al v. Cintas Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01062
Defendant:
Scott Farner, Robin Lung, cintas and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hawkins, Adam Dipzinski, Leigha Ayres and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Hawkins et al v. CooperSurgical, Inc et al.
as 1:2019cv01047
Plaintiff:
Petrae Hawkins and Samuel Young
Defendant:
CooperSurgical, Inc. and John Does 1-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2019cv05183
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Hawkins
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
