Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Hayes v. Blades
as 1:2011cv00502
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hayes
Defendant:
Randy Blades
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2011cv00365
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hayes
Defendant:
State of Idaho and Lawrence Wasden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Kootenai County et al
as 1:2010cv00327
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hayes
Defendant:
Kootenai County, Kootenai County Public Defenders Office, John Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00113
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Hayes et al v. Villegas et al
as 1:2010cv00064
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hayes, Banks M Luckado and Vince P Aschinger
Defendant:
Gilbert P Villegas, Kootenai County, Kootenai County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2010cv00011
Defendant:
Nancy Alyk, Katherine Livi, Debra Waters and others
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hayes, Albert Pete Veenstra, III, Lonnie L Haggard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2009cv00555
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hayes
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, John Ferguson, Phillip Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Law v. City of Post Falls et al
as 2:2009cv00504
Plaintiff:
Donald Lewis Law
Defendant:
City of Post Falls, Clifford T Hayes, Hope Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hayes v. Valdez et al
as 1:2009cv00122
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hayes
Defendant:
Phillip Valdez, Dan Prado, Brian Doser and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hayes v. State of Idaho
as 1:2008cv00559
Petitioner:
Derek Hayes
Respondent:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
