Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Hayes v. Carmart, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Hayes, Jr
Defendant:
Carmart, Inc. doing business as Carmart of Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Cavett v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Bryan Scott Cavett
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Juan Garcia, C Eppeland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Pope et al
as 6:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Johnson, Jr., Frederick Osbey, Brandon Thomas and others
Defendant:
Warden Juaquine E Pope, Warden II Juan Garcia, Asst Warden John R. Delapp, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Loyd
as 6:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Glenn Hayes
Defendant:
Oscar William Loyd, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Haymond v. Bey et al
as 1:2022cv00566
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Haymond
Defendant:
Tia Bey, Jeremy Trimble, Penny Liles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Target Corporation
as 1:2022cv00560
Plaintiff:
Brenda Hayes
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Mundine v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00929
Petitioner:
Jeremy Hayes Mundine
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mundine v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00930
Petitioner:
Jeremy Hayes Mundine
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes et al v. Locke Supply Co. et al
as 4:2022cv00767
Plaintiff:
Brynna Hayes and Adrian Rominu
Defendant:
Locke Supply Co. and Renwick Matthew Pierre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Sayyed v. Hayes et al
as 4:2022cv00499
Plaintiff:
Muamar Sayyed
Defendant:
Jaime Hayes, Cpl. FNU Moore, Lt. FNU McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
