Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Franklin v. Horton, et al
as 22-2030
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYCE FRANKLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU HORTON, Warden and HECTOR H. BALDERAS, Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Ortega v. Santistevan, et al
as 22-2029
Petitioner / Appellant:
NIEVES SONNY ORTEGA
Respondent / Appellee:
DWAYNE SANTISTEVAN, Warden and HECTOR H. BALDERAS, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Salas v. Martinez et al
as 1:2022cv00040
Petitioner:
Lorenzo A. Salas
Respondent:
Leon Martinez, Anthony Romero and Hector H. Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Balderas, et al v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, et al
as 21-9593
Petitioner:
THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO EX REL. HECTOR H. BALDERAS, Attorney General and the New Mexico Environment Department
Respondent:
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Anaya v. Central N.M.C.F et al
as 1:2021cv00650
Petitioner:
Arsenio R. Anaya
Respondent:
Central N.M.C.F and Hector H Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anaya v. CNMCF et al
as 1:2021cv00460
Petitioner:
Arsenio Anaya
Respondent:
CNMCF and Hector H. Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Amaro v. State of New Mexico, et al
as 21-2039
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JERRY ROARK, Director of Adult Prisons, JOE WILLIAMS, Secretary of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEDRO J. "PETE" AMARO
Thompkins v. Santistevan et al
as 2:2021cv00005
Respondent:
Hector H Balderas, Warden Dwayne Santistevan and Dwayne Santistevan
Petitioner:
Terrick L Thompkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Balderas v. Google
as 20-2172
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF NEW MEXICO, EX REL. HECTOR H. BALDERAS, Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Young v. Balderas
as 20-2141
Defendant / Appellee:
HECTOR H. BALDERAS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HUGUETTE NICOLE YOUNG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
