Cases 1 - 10 of 10
DURU v. KAISER PERMANENTE et al
as 1:2018cv02752
Defendant:
KAISER PERMANENTE GEORGIA, ROBERT SCHREINER, HEIDI H. HARRISON and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DURU v. KAISER PERMANENTE et al
as 1:2018cv02651
Defendant:
KAISER PERMANENTE GEORGIA, ROBERT SCHREINER, CRAIG FAERBER and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Duru v. Baker et al
as 1:2018cv01561
Defendant:
Eric Brennen, Mark S. Zemelman, Kaiser Family Foundation and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Adanma Duru
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00693
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose Duru v. DOJ, et al
as 17-5235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rose Adanma Duru
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Karen Mitchell, U.S. District Court Clerk for the Northern District of Texas and others
DURU v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2017cv01005
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, KAREN MITCHELL, U.S. DISTRICT COURT CLERK FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01226
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Duru v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2016cv01161
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Karen Mitchell, Jana S Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Adanma Duru
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duru v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2016cv01160
Defendant:
Department of Justice, NFN Miller, Kitty NLN and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Adanma Duru
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duru v. Schreiner et al
as 4:2016cv00219
Plaintiff:
Rose Adanma Duru
Defendant:
Robert Schreiner, Huron Consulting Group, Jana S Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
