Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Myers et al v. Highlands At Vista Ridge Homeowners Association, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00562
Defendant:
Roger Stockstad, Kay Henderson, Dennis Kinney and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Myers and Teresa Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Doe v. Dufur School District #29 et al
as 3:2019cv00289
Defendant:
Leo Baptiste, McKenzie Henderson, Dufur School District #29 and others
Plaintiff:
Michele Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Henderson v. GBMO, LLC
as 3:2017cv01272
Defendant:
GBMO, LLC
Plaintiff:
Diana Ramirez Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mayes v. Mulkins et al
as 1:2017cv01078
Defendant:
Kevin Bliach, Jess Elzy, Tonya Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. Emerald Properties
as 6:2016cv01956
Defendant:
Emerald Properties
Plaintiff:
Christine Diane Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Henderson v. Emerald Property et al
as 6:2015cv02286
Defendant:
Emerald Property, Lane County Courts and Judge Josephine Mooney
Plaintiff:
Christine Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
