Cases 1 - 7 of 7
The Miller Law Firm, LLC, et al v. Laborde Earles Law Firm, et al
as 21-16228
Not Classified By Court:
In re: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Appellant:
THE MILLER LAW FIRM, LLC and WEITZ & LUXENBERG
Appellee:
LABORDE EARLES LAW FIRM, BERNSTEIN LIEBHARD, LLP, PENDLEY BAUDIN & COFFIN, LLP and others
Crumley Roberts, LLP et al v. Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC
as 2:2021cv02261
Defendant:
Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC, Timothy C. Davis, W. Lewis Garrison, Jr. and others
Counter Defendant:
Crumley Roberts, LLP
Plaintiff:
Burke Harvey, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Crumley Roberts, LLP et al v. Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC
as 3:2021cv00315
Defendant:
Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC
Plaintiff:
Crumley Roberts, LLP and Burke Harvey, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Syngenta (Shields Law)
as 21-3021
Appellant:
PAUL BYRD LAW FIRM, PLLC and SHIELDS LAW GROUP, LLC
Appellee:
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C., HENINGER GARRISON DAVIS, LLC, STUEVE SIEGEL HANSON LLP and others
In re: Syngenta Toups/Coffman
as 21-3020
Appellant:
THOMAS P. CALHOUN, III, RICHARD L. COFFMAN, P.C., THOMPSON, GARRETT & HINES and others
Appellee:
STUEVE SIEGEL HANSON LLP, WATTS GUERRA LLP, CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C. and others
In re: Syngenta Hossley-Embry
as 21-3022
Appellee:
SHAMBERG JOHNSON & BERGMAN, CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C., GUSTAFSON GLUEK PLLC and others
Appellant:
HOSSLEY-EMBRY, LLP
Heninger Law Firm Plaintiffs, et al v. Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel, et al
as 08-2131
:
In re: Guidant Corp. Implantable Defibrillators Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiffs Represented by The Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC Law Firm
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel Committee
Defendant - Appellee:
Guidant Corporation, Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. and Guidant Sales Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
