Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ayotte v. The Boeing Company
as 1:2018cv02662
Defendant:
The Boeing Company , A.W. Chesterton Company, H.B. Fuller Company and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Ayotte
Cross_claimant:
The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company , The Toro Company , Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
Daniel L Ayotte , United Technologies Corporation-Pratt & Whitney Division, Dana Companies, LLC and others
Counter_claimant:
Industrial Holdings Corporation , MTD Products, Inc. and Tenneco, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
United Technologies Corporation-Pratt & Whitney Division, Dana Companies, LLC , Carlisle Industrial Brake & Friction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Madaris et al v. Adel Wiggins, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01223
Defendant:
Adel Wiggins, Inc., Bucyrus International, Inc., Dana Companies, LLC. and others
Counter Defendant:
Flowserve Corp., Ameron International Corporation, Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Lear Siegler Diversified Holding, Inc., Borgwagner Morse Tec, Inc., Hysol and others
Cross Claimant:
Ingersoll Rand Company and General Electric Company
Plaintiff:
James E Madaris, Jr and Sandra S Madaris
Counter Claimant:
Industrial Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Fletcher et al v. Ajax Magnethermic Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv00779
Plaintiff:
Raymond Fletcher and Patricia Fletcher
Defendant:
Ajax Magnethermic Corporation, Asbestos Corporation LTD., Boeing Co. and others
Cross_claimant:
Pneumo Abex LLC
Cross_defendant:
Ajax Magnethermic Corporation, Asbestos Corporation LTD., Boeing Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Fletcher et al v. Ajax Magnethermic Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv00765
Plaintiff:
Raymond Fletcher and Patricia Fletcher
Defendant:
Ajax Magnethermic Corporation, Asbestos Corporation LTD., Boeing Co. and others
Cross_claimant:
Honeywell International, Inc. , Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. , Eaton Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
Ajax Magnethermic Corporation, Asbestos Corporation LTD., Boeing Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Hasenberg et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv01325
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Cummins Inc., Georgia Pacific, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
William Hasenberg, Jr. and Linda Hasenberg
Cross Defendant:
Kelsey-Hayes Company, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Pneumo Abex LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Kirkendall v. AO Smith Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv09024
Plaintiff:
Mary Jean Kirkendall
Defendant:
A.O. Smith Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Shewmake v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01223
Cross Defendant:
Rockwell Automation, Inc., Crane Company, Beazer East, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Welco Manufacturing Company, Brand Insulations, Inc., Young Insulation Group of St. Louis, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
General Cable Industries, Inc., AERCO International, Inc., Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Helen Pearl Shewmake
Counter Claimant:
Grimes Aerospace Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Hennessy Industries, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
as 1:2013cv06126
Plaintiff:
Hennessy Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yates v. A. W. Chesterton, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00659
Plaintiff:
Barbara Yates
Defendant:
A. W. Chesterton, Inc., Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Allied Manufacturing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Deisher v. Rapid American Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv02274
Defendant:
Rapid American Corporation, Garlock, Inc., A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Plaintiff:
Wilber Deisher
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
