Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00294
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Alao v. Kolitwenzew et al
as 1:2022cv01020
Petitioner:
Oludolapo Alao
Respondent:
Chad Kolitwenzew, Merrick Garrand, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wasia Maya v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 21-3337
Petitioner:
WASIA K. MAYA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, TAE D. JOHNSON, Acting Director of ICE, HENRY LUCERO, ICE Chicago Field Office Director and others
Gonzalez v. Kolitwenzew et al
as 2:2021cv02281
Petitioner:
Rafael Morales Gonzalez
Respondent:
Chad Kolitwenzew, Merrick Garrand, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01051
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01037
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-2453
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00851
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00845
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Park v. Lucero et al
as 1:2021cv03671
Plaintiff:
Hyo Ku Park
Defendant:
Henry Lucero, MERRICK B GARLAND and Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
