Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv08442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
LILAC DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC v. HESS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv07547
Plaintiff:
LILAC DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
HESS CORPORATION and SPEEDWAY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SUMMIT TRANSPORT CORP. v. HESS ENERGY MARKETING, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv05119
Plaintiff:
SUMMIT TRANSPORT CORP.
Defendant:
HESS ENERGY MARKETING, LLC and HESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv07091
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., HUDSON RIVER ASSOCIATES, LLC, METROPOLITAN CONSOM, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613 CERCLA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. HESS CORPORATION
as 2:2012cv02335
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Defendant:
HESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413
SMITH v. HESS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2012cv02241
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK SMITH
Defendant:
HESS CORPORATION, CORALUZZO CORPORATION and FEMALE GAS ATTENDANT X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'KEEFE v. HESS CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv02598
Plaintiff:
DAVID O'KEEFE
Defendant:
HESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HESS CORPORATION v. SENATORE SHIPPING COMPANY LIMITED et al
as 2:2009cv03053
Plaintiff:
HESS CORPORATION
Defendant:
SENATORE SHIPPING COMPANY LIMITED, SCORPIO SHIP MANAGEMENT S.A.M. and M.T. SENATORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
