Cases 21 - 30 of 65
DOE v. ANN KLEIN FORENSIC CENTER et al
as 3:2019cv07610
Defendant:
KENNETH GLOVER, DR. GLENN FERGUSON, LINDA ELIAS and others
Plaintiff:
LAUREN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. SCHAFFER et al
as 1:2018cv11566
Defendant:
CAPE MAY COUNTY, GRADY FAIRCLOTH, WILLIAM LEARY and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2018cv00777
Plaintiff:
STEVE A. HILL
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE, LUIS NEGRON, ESQ., HOWARD BARMAN, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv07338
Petitioner:
TARON HILL
Respondent:
STEVEN JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHITE v. SORRELL
as 2:2017cv06524
Plaintiff:
GERALD HILL WHITE
Defendant:
R. SORRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2017cv05491
Petitioner:
SPILLERMAN HILL
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBINSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv04949
Petitioner:
DEMETRIUS HILL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HOUSER v. REILLY et al
as 2:2017cv01879
Plaintiff:
BRANDON HOUSER
Defendant:
SAMUEL REILLY, MATTHEW HILL, KEVIN CARROLL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv09594
Plaintiff:
FLOYD HILL JONES
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMICK v. SMITH et al
as 1:2016cv08844
Plaintiff:
LESLIE LYLE CAMICK
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER E. SMITH, LINDA LOOMIS, NICOLE HILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
